Bagian Skripsi yang udah kelar
Sunday, July 29th, 2007The
Inadequacies of the Indonesian Insolvency System, Legal Theories and Some
Recommendations
"It is universally accepted that well-functioning economies need well
designed bankruptcy procedures" -’When Countries Go Bust’, The Economist,
3 October, 1998, 88.
Abstract
Introduction
A. Background to Thesis
B. Hypothesis
C. Structure of Thesis
Chapter 1
The Development of Indonesia’s Legal System
A. Introduction
B. Discussion
1.1 The Development of Legal System in colonial era
1.1.1 Dutch Colonial Legal System
1.1.2 The Japanese Colonial Legal System
1.2 The Development of Legal System after Independence
1.2.1 The Sukarno Government
1.2.2 The Suharto Government (Reformation- New Order)
1.3 Transition to True Democracy
1.3.1 Abdulrahman Wahid Government to the SBY Government
C. Conclusion
Chapter 2
The Development of Insolvency Regime and its Interaction with
General Societal Elements
A. Introduction
B. Discussion
2.1 Faillissements-Verordening Regulations
Concerning Bankruptcy of 1906 No.348
2.2 The 1998 Amendments Law No 4 of 1998
2.2.1 General Background to the 1998
Amendments
2.2.2 Behavior Surrounding the 1997/1998
Economic Crisis
2.2.3 The Financial Crisis
2.2.4 The Structure of the 1998 Amendments
2.2.5 The Commercial Court
2.2.5.1 Suyanto Gondokusumo v PT Asuransi Jiwa Manulife Indonesia
2.3 The 2004 Amendments Law no 37 of 2004
2.3.1 Specific Changes and some updates in the
2004 Amendments
2.3.1.1 Definitions
2.3.1.2 Who can file petitions
2.3.3.3 The Timing Provisions
2.3.3.4 The role of receivers and receivers’ fees
2.3.3.5 Suspension of Payments Obligations
2.3.3.6 Detention
2.3.3.7 Employment issues
2.3.3.8 Institutional Developments
2.3.3.8.1 Yayasan Lembaga Konsumen Indonesia v Departmen Keuangan Pemerintah RI
2.3.3.9 Legal Professionals
2.4 Enforcement of Insolvency Law in Indonesia
2.4.1 IBRA Indonesian Banking Restructuring
Agency
2.4.2 The Jakarta Initiative
2.4.3 General Trends in Insolvency Reform
System
2.4.3.1 Management Systems in Financial Institutions
2.4.3.2 Credit Risk Information System and the Financial
Safety Net
C. Conclusion
Chapter 3
Relevant legal
theories to establish good practice standards
A. Introduction
B. Discussion
3.1 Theory of Globalisation and Insolvency Systems
3.1.1 A Negotiated Process
3.1.2 Highly Regularized Corporate Insolvencies and the UNCITRAL model law
3.1.2.1 Cross Border Insolvency Dilemma
3.1.2.2 Governance and Corporate Governance
3.1.2.3 The UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law
3.1.2.4 The Principles of the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide
3.2 Theory of Legal Transplantation
3.2.1 Perils of Legal Transplantation
3.3 Theory of Legal Culture
3.3.1 Japan: Culture as an element of failure to transplant the US Bankruptcy laws
3.3.2 Indonesia, Culture and Insolvency Laws
3.4 The Rule of Law
3.4.1 Definition of the Rule of Law
3.4.2 Corruption and Separation of Powers
3.4.3 The Role of Black Conglomerates
Chapter 4
Policy Prescriptions for Improving Indonesian Insolvency Law and
Legal Reforms
